Which of the following can be expressed as sum of two squares

Math Expert

Joined: 02 Sep 2009

Posts: 87849

Which of the following can be expressed as sum of two squares
Which of the following can be expressed as sum of two squares
Which of the following can be expressed as sum of two squares

Which of the following CANNOT be expressed as the sum of squares of tw [#permalink]

Which of the following can be expressed as sum of two squares
  12 Jul 2018, 00:16

Which of the following can be expressed as sum of two squares

Which of the following can be expressed as sum of two squares

00:00

Difficulty:

Which of the following can be expressed as sum of two squares
Which of the following can be expressed as sum of two squares
Which of the following can be expressed as sum of two squares
5% (low)

Question Stats:

Which of the following can be expressed as sum of two squares
89% (01:20) correct
Which of the following can be expressed as sum of two squares
11% (01:13) wrong
Which of the following can be expressed as sum of two squares
based on 66 sessions

Hide Show timer Statistics

Which of the following can be expressed as sum of two squares

Which of the following CANNOT be expressed as the sum of squares of two integer?A 13B 17C 21D 29

E 34

_________________

examPAL Representative

Joined: 07 Dec 2017

Posts: 1071

Re: Which of the following CANNOT be expressed as the sum of squares of tw [#permalink]

Which of the following can be expressed as sum of two squares
  12 Jul 2018, 00:54

Bunuel wrote:

Which of the following CANNOT be expressed as the sum of squares of two integer?A 13B 17C 21D 29

E 34

As we don't have that many options, we'll test them all.This is an Alternative approach.We only need to look at the squares up to 5^2 (as 6^2 = 36 is larger than our largest value).So there are a total of 5 choose 2 = 10 options.1 + 4 = 51 + 9 = 101 + 16 = 17 **1 + 25 = 264 + 9 = 13 **4 + 16 = 204 + 25 = 29 **9 + 16 = 259 + 25 = 34 **16 + 25 = 41(C) is our answer. _________________

Director

Which of the following can be expressed as sum of two squares

Joined: 20 Feb 2015

Posts: 656

Concentration: Strategy, General Management

Re: Which of the following CANNOT be expressed as the sum of squares of tw [#permalink]

Which of the following can be expressed as sum of two squares
  12 Jul 2018, 01:30

Bunuel wrote:

Which of the following CANNOT be expressed as the sum of squares of two integer?A 13B 17C 21D 29

E 34

13=2^2+3^217=4^2+1^221=Cannot be expressed29=5^2+2^234=5^2+3^2

C

VP

Which of the following can be expressed as sum of two squares

Joined: 31 Oct 2013

Posts: 1311

Concentration: Accounting, Finance

GPA: 3.68

WE:Analyst (Accounting)

Re: Which of the following CANNOT be expressed as the sum of squares of tw [#permalink]

Which of the following can be expressed as sum of two squares
  12 Jul 2018, 02:53

Bunuel wrote:

Which of the following CANNOT be expressed as the sum of squares of two integer?A 13B 17C 21D 29

E 34

A bit tricky question. Number testing is the way to get the answer.\(3^2\) + \(2^2\) = 13\(4^2\) + \(1^1\) = 17\(5^2\)+ \(2^2\) = 29\(5^2\) + \(3^2\) = 34Now , option C is left. That's our answer. Try different number less than 21. There is a reason. 21 = 3*7 or 21*1. See none of the factors are square of an integer except 1. Thus it is also impossible to express 21 as a sum of the square of the 2 integers.

The best answer is C.

Director

Joined: 01 Oct 2017

Status:Learning stage

Posts: 854

WE:Supply Chain Management (Energy and Utilities)

Re: Which of the following CANNOT be expressed as the sum of squares of tw [#permalink]

Which of the following can be expressed as sum of two squares
  12 Jul 2018, 12:59

Bunuel wrote:

Which of the following CANNOT be expressed as the sum of squares of two integer?A 13B 17C 21D 29

E 34

Every prime of the form (4k+1) can be expressed as the sum of two squares..

Among the answer options 13,17, and 29 are prime and they can be written in the form (4k+1). So, eliminate A,B, and D.

when the number is not prime:- If each of the factors of the integer can be written as the sum of two squares is itself expressible as the sum of two squares.

Prime factorization of 34=2*17, (\(2=1^2+1^2\) & 17 is in the form of 4k+1. So, both 2 & 17 are perfect squares)Therefore, 34 is a sum of squares of two integer.So, eliminate E.Ans. (C) _________________

Regards,PKN


Rise above the storm, you will find the sunshine

Which of the following can be expressed as sum of two squares

Re: Which of the following CANNOT be expressed as the sum of squares of tw [#permalink]

A postive integer $n$ is representable as the sum of two squares, $n=x^2+y^2$ if and only if every prime divisor $p\equiv 3$ mod $4$ of $n$ occurs with even exponent. This is good enough to solve your questions.

a) $n=363=3\cdot 11^2$ is not the sum of two squares, since $3$ is a prime divisor $p\equiv 3$ mod $4$ occuring not with even multiplicity.

b) $n=700=2^2\cdot 5^2\cdot 7$ is not the sum of two squares. Take $p=7$.

c) $n=34300=2^2\cdot 5^2\cdot 7^3$ is not the sum of two squares. Take $p=7$.

d) $n=325=5^2\cdot 13$ is a sum of two squares, because every prime divisor $p\equiv 3$ mod $4$ occurs with even multiplicity - because $0$ is even. Of course, it is straightforward to see that, say, $325=10^2+15^2$.