Measuring disasters
This case study looks at the disaster of the meltdown at Fukushima Nuclear Power Station March 2011. This disaster was the worst nuclear accident since Chernobyl in Ukraine in 1986; it remains one of only two Category 7 nuclear accidents. Nuclear power - technically non-renewable because it relies on uranium which is a finite resource, but renewable in the sense that it can be refined and processed and used again several times before it is depleted; also, the reserves of uranium would last thousands of years into the future
Source for maps: http://www.voanews.com/content/new-leak-found-at-japans-fukushima-nuclear-plant/1732983.html
The Fukushima disaster occurred due to a strong tsunami that itself was caused by one of the strongest recorded earthquakes. The tsunami inundated (swamped) the nuclear power plant which had been designed to withstand a smaller natural hazard event. Background to nuclear accidents
Source: http://www.theguardian.com/news/datablog/2011/mar/14/nuclear-power-plant-accidents-list-rank The diagram below shows the International Nuclear and Radiological Event Scale. The levels consider three aspects:
Source: http://www-ns.iaea.org/tech-areas/emergency/ines.asp
Source: http://blog.thomsonreuters.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/japan-anniversary.jpg The video below is a long but powerful documentary about the nuclear disaster. Short term reponses
Source: http://blog.thomsonreuters.com/index.php/tag/fukushima-daiichi/ Long term responses and impacts The following impacts are sourced from Al Jazeera and other news websites:
|