The behavioral theories view leadership as a set of actions that people can be trained in.
The Ohio State Model of Leader Behavior (also called Ohio State Leadership Studies) is a survey framework on leadership studies conducted by a group of researchers to address the question of how behavior of a leader impacts on members of group's job performanceOpens in new window, and satisfactionOpens in new window. A series of surveys on leadership behavior was conducted by researchers at the Ohio State UniversityOpens in new window to identify specific dimensions of leader behavior. The study narrowed a list of almost 2,000 leader behaviors into a questionnaire which they developed and labeled “Leader Behavior Description QuestionnaireOpens in new window (LBDQ)”. The questionnaire contained 150 examples of definitive leader behaviors and was administered to employees. Hundreds of employees responded to behavior examples according to the degree to which their leaders engaged in the various behaviors. The analysis of ratings resulted in two wide-ranging categories of leader behavior types, identified as consideration and initiating structure.
Researchers have hypothesized that group performance would be maximized when a manager exhibits a leadership style that is high in both consideration and initiating structure. When the two components of leadership are placed on separate axes and the window boxes are filled in, as the figure indicates below, four leader behavior styles result.
The four quadrants in the Ohio State model can be explained as follows.
Additional studies that correlated the two leader behavior types (consideration and initiating structure), and impact on followers initially demonstrated that considerate leaders had a more positive impact on employee satisfaction than did structuring leaders. For example, when leader effectiveness was defined by voluntary turnover or amount of grievances filed by followers, considerate leaders generated less turnover and grievances. But research that utilized performance criteria, such as group and productivity, showed initiating structure behavior was rated more effective. Other studies involving aircraft commanders and university department heads revealed that leaders rated effective by followers exhibited a high level of both consideration and initiating structure behaviors, whereas leaders rated less effective displayed low levels of both behavior styles.
The Ohio State Studies on Leadership is one among the behavioral theories of leadership. A gaggle of researchers at Ohio State University conducted an in-depth study of leadership behavior and effectiveness. The essential purpose of this study was to spot the independent dimensions of leader behavior and to work out the effect of those dimensions on work performance and satisfaction. After the Ohio State Studies, they found the 2 dimensions of a leader’s behavior, 1st is initiating structure and 2nd is a consideration. Initiating structure refers to the extent to which a pacesetter (leader) probably going to line goals, define and structure his or her roles, define and organize the task which his followers need to do, specifies work relationships and directions, and regulates the performance of his group members. Leaders scoring high initiating structure could achieve high productivity or performance. Consideration is defined because of the extent to which the leader features a supportive work relationship characterized by warmth and mutual trust, good relations, and respect for feelings, ideas, and suggestions of group members. there’s a robust concern for follower’s comfort, well-being, status, and satisfaction. The leader is friendly, approachable, and treats subordinates fairly. These two leadership dimensions also can be represented within the following diagram: Describing the above diagram:
The Ohio State Studies’ two leadership orientations are independent of every other. That is, a pacesetter could also be high in both, high in one while low on the other or low on both. However, the studies concluded that the mixture of high consideration and initiating structure in leader behavior were likely to end in high productivity and satisfaction at an equivalent time. |