Which PES role has a fitness report responsibility to provide a summary of accomplishments using the MRO worksheet?

1 Performance Evaluation System (PES)
Greetings and salutations.

2 Topics of Discussion PES Objectives Organization and Mission
Automated Performance Evaluation System (A-PES) General Rules Responsibilities Compliance Issues Selection Board Information Points of Contact These are the topics that we will discuss.

3 References U. S. Navy Regulations 1990, Article 1129 and 1122
Marine Corps Manual Performance Evaluation System (PES) Manual (MCO P1610.7E) Performance Evaluation Appeals (MCO C) Marine Corps Physical Fitness Test/Body Composition Program (MCPFTBCP)(MCO P ) Article 1129, U. S. Navy Regulations directs the CMC to maintain records on all enlisted Marines and officers to reflect their fitness for service and performance of duties. Promotion and assignment to duty is determined by an individual’s record, of which the record of fitness and performance is an integral part. The preparation of these reports shall be regarded by superiors and commanding officers as one of the most important and responsible duties.

4 PES Objectives Ensure accurate, honest, and consistent reporting.
Prevent inflation. Ensure timely receipt of reports. Ensure accuracy of official records. Provide info for selection boards. When all is said and done this is what we hope to have conveyed to everyone.

5 Personnel Management Division (MM) Organization
Manpower Management, under the direction of the Director, Personnel Management Division, is responsible for the administration, retention, distribution, appointment, evaluation, awarding, promotion, retirement, discharge, separation, and service records of commissioned officers, warrant officers, and enlisted personnel of the Marine Corps and Marine Corps Reserve. MMSB works with the promotion, reenlistment, and assignment branches as each depend on the OMPF and MBS to make decisions.

6 MMSB Mission The Personnel Management Support Branch (MMSB)
directs and controls the functions necessary to create, maintain, and archive official military personnel files (OMPFs) and directs and controls the functions and operation of the performance evaluation system (PES). In addition, our mission includes unit diary research activities and worldwide locator services for the Marine Corps. Bottom line, MMSB’s mission is to maintain the most accurate record on a Marine at all times; therefore, it is important that reporting officials and commands provide MMSB with data on time..

7 MMSB Organizational Structure
Discharge Certificate OMPF Inputs Fitness Reports Computer Support Archives DD 214’s Master Brief Sheets OMPF/MBS RS/RO Profiles There are 5 sections within MMSB. MMSB-30 is the clearinghouse for fitness reports and master brief sheets.

8 MMSB-30 Organization Compliance Corrections Education Receipt Audit
We receive 100,000+ reports annually. Currently, COMPLIANCE is being stressed. Note that each section has a responsibility to audit for compliance. Compliance Corrections Education Receipt Audit Corrections Compliance Corrections Education

9 A-PES Web-based assessable via Marine On Line (MOL)
70% of total force (95% of active units) Non-Marines can obtain MOL accounts A-PES FOC estimated during 2005 A-PES is simply the web-based version of WINNIFE. Lots of fancy looking buttons, but the same concept.

10 A-PES Features MCTFS Interface - Section A pre-populated
Improves administrative accuracy 97% of A-PES reports are accurate 50% of WinFE reports are accurate Worksheets retained for 18 months Reports retained for 90 days after completion Command Reviewer, Trusted Assistant, and Batch Processing Functionality Although use of A-PES is not mandatory its use is highly encouraged. Also, even though HQMC has not made use mandatory it does not mean that the CG or CO can’t.

11 A-PES Access

12 A-PES Welcome Page

13 MRO – MROW Creation Page

14 MROW - 1st Page of MROW

15 MRO - 2nd Page of MROW

16 Create Fitness Report

17 Create Fitness Report From MROW

18 Section A Data

19 Section A Data (cont)

20 Page 2- 4/Sections D-H

21 Section I and RS Certification

22 Command Review Option

23 Status Page

24 Printed Fitness Report

25 Route to Reviewing Officer

26 RS Logout

27 Page 5 / Section K

28 Reviewing Officer Certification

29 Send for Command Review

30 Submission to MMSB

31 Acknowledgment of Submission to MMSB

32 Trusted Assistant

33 General Rules A-PES does not nullify requirement to counsel MRO throughout reporting period. 90 or more days normally required for an observed fitness report. Justification required for observed fitness reports of 89-days or less. Not observed reports can be rendered adverse. Completed reports due to HQMC 30-days after reporting period ends. Submission of reports tied to promotion boards. The intent is that the promotion board receives the most current evaluation of the Marines performance and fitness for promotion from the field.

34 Reporting Chain Note: The MRO is not part of the reporting chain.
Reporting Senior (RS) Reviewing Officer (RO) Third Officer Sighter (3OS) Adverse reports only Senior Marine Representative (SMR) Non-Marine RS and RO external to the Marine Corps reports only Commandant of the Marine Corps (MMSB-30) Note: The MRO is not part of the reporting chain. Bottom line, the RS and the RO are responsible for ensuring the Marine gets an accurate report generated and submitted on time. We are seeing reporting officials blaming MRO’s for the late submission of fitness reports. This can’t be as it is ultimately the responsibilities of the reporting officials to complete the report on time.

35 Command Responsibilities
Review reports at command level. Ensure reports adhere to PES policy. Ensure reports do not contain inflated markings. Ensure reports contain sufficient justifications, as applicable. Ensure reports do not contain unwarranted comments. Free of ambiguities Free of innuendos No “velvet knives” Ensure reports arrive to HQMC on time. Marines in Iraq calling HQMC trying to fix their fitness report records. This is unsatisfactory and we as reporting seniors and senior enlisted advisors are failing them. No sympathy at HQMC for RS’s and RO’s that don’t perform their duties.

36 MRO Responsibilities Possess a clear understanding of his or her role in accomplishing the unit’s mission. Possess a general understanding of the PES. Submit billet description to RS within the first 15-days of the reporting period. Submit summary of accomplishments to RS prior to end of reporting period. Empower your Marines to take an active role in their performance evaluation. Marines have no problem telling what positive things they have done.

37 RS Responsibilities Establish, formalize, and review billet description at outset of reporting period utilizing MRO worksheet. Counsel MRO on duties, responsibilities, and RS’s expectations throughout the reporting period. Provide in-depth observation of MRO’s performance, professional qualities, and potential. Ensure accuracy of sections A thru I. Forward report to RO in a timely manner. These are two areas that would alleviate a lot of the fitness reports corrections and appeals. Not being counseled is the number one reason Marines appeal reports; unfortunately, they really have to show that their lack of performance was directly tied to them being counseled.

38 RO Responsibilities Educate subordinates on fitness report responsibilities, PES policy, and proper evaluation methods. Make every effort to know professional capabilities of the MRO. Take corrective action to eliminate inflated and late reports. Complete section K, as applicable. Ensure accuracy and timely submission of reports. The reviewing officer is critical to the PES. ALL compliance issues will be addressed to the RO by HQMC.

39 RO Responsibilities (cont)
Non-Marine RS/RO (external to USMC) Forward report to SMR for review Assess adverse reports and adjudicate factual differences between RS’s evaluation and MRO’s statement. Forward adverse report to Third Officer Sighter. The RO cannot make an RS change markings or comments that are subjective; however, the RO can direct changes to a report that clearly do not comply with the PES manual or its spirit and intent.

40 3OS Responsibilities Sight all adverse fitness reports.
Take action to resolve inconsistencies and disagreements when MRO’s statement disagrees with RO as to matters of fact. Take action to determine validity of new info when MRO’s statement adds new info that RO did not previously address. If 3OS comments add new adversity refer report to MRO for acknowledgment. From a review of hundreds of adverse fitness reports 3OS’s do a pretty good job here, but they shouldn’t have to perform the RS and RO’s duties.

41 SMR Responsibilities Provide non-Marine RSs and ROs guidance and education on PES policy. Review all reports for administrative correctness. May comment on the MRO, if desired. Observation pertinent to billet assignment and mission accomplishment. “Whole Marine” Concept Marine Corps standards, values, and professional growth exhibited. SMR’s will also be held accountable for fitness reports that do not comply with the PES. Contrary to popular belief there are non-Marine reporting seniors that do not inflate their fitness reports. It is the SMR’s responsibility to ensure all are complying.

42 CMC Policy Compliance To maintain the integrity of the PES MMSB-30 will monitor how well reporting officials are performing their duties and proactively identify, notify, and educate reporting officials displaying undesirable reporting trends indicating gaming, inflation, untimely submission of reports, inaccurate reporting, and procedural errors. These trends will be reported to the reviewing officer of the report first. Also, point out the sporadic use of the Section H evaluation attribute. RO’s need to start to utilize to its intended purpose—to critically evaluate fitness reporting of reporting seniors.

43 Trends Failure to provide MRO copy of report
Failure to use the MMSB website to eliminate date gaps (Proceed/Travel/Delay) Failure to use of proper occasion codes Failure to generate To Temporary Duty (TD) reports Inaccurate and incomplete height/weight/BF Failure to complete sections B and C Negative and evaluative comments made in section C (Billet Accomplishments) These are number one reasons that reports are pulled by the PERB/BCNR.

44 Trends (cont) “Effectiveness Under Stress” and “Courage” not evaluated. Adverse reports not referred to MRO for acknowledgment Adverse report not adjudicated properly by RO or 3OS. Adverse reports not referred to 3OS for action. Failure to use senior enlisted advisors in evaluation process. Superior marking justifications not concrete, substantive, verifiable, or quantitative. Approximately, 33% of all fitness reports submitted to HQMC are returned for inflation.

45 Marking Philosophy Considerations
Grade, experience in grade, and accumulated experience as a Marine. Performance for a defined period and specific set of duties and responsibilities. Understand personal ability and individual performance over a course of career develops a record of merit. No deficiencies in any given area does not mean a Marine rates an “F” or “G”.

46 Marking Philosophy Considerations (cont)
RS must accurately evaluate each Marine in context of time and circumstance to provide the CMC a clear picture of MRO’s performance. RS must not inflate performance. RS must understand “D” thru “G” not to find fault, nor to puff-up competency, but objectively evaluate Marines on their own merits.

47 Performance Anchored Rating Scales (PARS)
When rating your Marines’ performance we suggest you read from left to right and when you hit the spot that describes your Marines’ performance you drop down an mark the block accordingly.

48 Adverse Markings Attribute marking of “A” must clearly describe nature and condition of the observed poor performance. Do not use the report as a counseling tool to address poor performance. Do not report minor flaws or mistakes unless they are significant enough to effect MRO’s initiative and leadership potential or hinder mission accomplishment. Do not comment on minor limitations, shortcomings, and occasional lapses, or weaknesses in an overall positive performance. MRO must have been given the opportunity to provide input on adverse reports or 10 times out of 10 the report will be removed from the record.

49 Adverse Comments “Sometimes he is absolutely brilliant in the things he did, and at an equal number of times he was terribly disappointing.” “Although MRO puts forth efforts, he is well behind his peer group.” “…has ability to become a good NCO if he applies himself and utilizes initiative.” “…needs to learn to delegate, rather than trying to do everything himself.” “Working on honing skills required of a staff officer-especially commander’s intent.” “…has reached his culminating point as a Marine Corps Officer.”

50 Distinguished Marks “F” and “G” mean exceptional sustained performance throughout reporting period. Support superior markings with concrete examples. Do not restate the attribute!!!! Require justifications that withstand three tests: Verifiable Substantive Quantifiable (Where Possible) Remember, sections F thru G tell how well the Marine performed. The justification tells what he/she did and what the impact was to the unit accomplishing the mission.

51 Distinguished Marks (cont)
Rarely should isolated incidents merit a marking in either block. “G” marking should reflect a truly extraordinary level or performance observed. Stay away from “cliches” and “analogies“ about performance. “Juggling cotton balls in a wind storm” and “Making water flow upstream” does not tell anything. References to Marines looking and acting like Chesty Puller or Tarzan does not tell exactly what the MRO did during the period.

52 Examples of Unacceptable Justifications
PERFORMANCE: "F" MARKED Superb performance during this period that exceeded expectations. Best Marine I have observed in my 22 years in the Corps. Can be counted on to accomplish any mission with minimal supervision. MRO’s efforts during this period was outstanding and led to success levels never seen by the FDC in this command. Peerless. Promote. INITIATIVE: "F" MARKED Distinctly observed by myself as the one disbursing chief in this command that is not afraid to make a decision without asking questions on the proper course of action. He is confident in his abilities and can back it up with action. Solves critical issues before they become serious problems. I’ll let you read these two justifications! Now let me add, this is a perfect example of what we see on a daily basis. Note, there is no reference to concrete examples as to what the MRO accomplished during the period.

53 Examples of Acceptable Justifications
PERFORMANCE : "F" MARKING Implemented procedural changes within the FDC that resulted in an increase in timeliness and safety of computations. Instituted a policy that required gun sections to read back the announced firing charge. As a result, the Battery had zero firing incidents. Developed a method of transmitting firing timeliness to gun sections via gun display units that increased speed of the battery’s fire support and prevented transposition of digits that occur during transmission of voice fire commands. INITIATIVE: "F" MARKING Pensacola, NAS caused unexpected travel settlements to post to T&E acct. Contacted HQMC/Pensacola and adjusted T&E procedure for aviation students to allow schoolhouse to request appropriation data directly from T&E, where others are required to make requests through HQMC. Efforts led to 100% reduction in unexpected travel orders originating at Pensacola. Solution will remain in place until HQMC adjusts travel regulations associated with Marines in initial accession training pipeline. Note, the concrete examples that speak to actual behavior and actions that led to measurable results. Remember, justifications need to be verifiable, substantive, and quantifiable.

54 RS Profile Reporting Senior Fitness Report List CWO3 JOHNNY B. GOODE
Reporting Senior SSN: As of: MRO SSN (Last Four) Last Name From Date To Date Occ FitRep Avg MSGT 1234 Smith 01 Dec Jun 02 AN 4.85 2235 Jones 01 Oct Nov 01 TR 4.36 3456 Thomas 01 Dec Sep 01 TR 2.92 4432 Brown 01 Sep Nov 00 GC 2.54 GYSGT 9876 Green 22 Jan Jun 01 AN 5.79 8765 Black 01 May Aug 02 CH 5.07 7676 White 01 Jul Oct 01 GC 4.85 7676 White 03 Jul Jun 01 AN 4.07 Reporting officials need to review their profiles and stay in touch to ensure their markings philosophy remains consistent. Many requests to have reports modified by the Board for Correction of Naval Records centers around reporting officials erroneously evaluating their Marines. Most of these issues could be avoided if the reporting official was aware of his/her profile. The profile can validate your marking philosophy.

55 RO Profile Reviewing Officer Fitness Report List COL JOHNNY B. GOODE
Reporting Senior SSN: As of: MRO SSN RO (Last Four) Last Name From Date To Date Occ Assessment Mark MAJ 1234 Smith 01 Dec Jun 02 AN 6 2235 Jones 01 Oct Nov 01 TR 5 3456 Thomas 01 Dec Sep 01 TR 5 4432 Brown 01 Sep Nov 00 GC 4 CAPT 9876 Green 22 Jan Jun 01 AN 7 8765 Black 01 May Aug 02 CH 5 7676 White 01 Jul Oct 01 GC 4 7676 White 03 Jul Jun 01 AN 4 Reporting officials need to review their profiles and stay in touch to ensure their markings philosophy remains consistent. Many requests to have reports modified by the Board for Correction of Naval Records centers around reporting officials erroneously evaluating their Marines. Most of these issues could be avoided if the reporting official was aware of his/her profile. The profile can validate your marking philosophy.

56 MASTER BRIEF SHEET PAGE 1 OF 1 CREATED: 26 APR 2005 ******* ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION (ORIGINATES FROM MCTFS - CONTACT YOUR ADMIN SECTION FOR CORRECTIONS) ******* NAME SSN GRADE RANK LCN DOR TIG CURRENT DUTY ASSIGNMENT BILLET DESCRIPTION DCTB MARINE, JOHN S. O4 MAJ 5yr. 11mo. US Central Command J-3 Future Ops Officer KEY DATE SUMMARY AWARDS MILITARY OCCUPATIONAL SPECIALTIES TRAINING SUMMARY LANGUAGES DEAF MM 1 PMOS 0302 Infantry Officer AMOS4 RIFLE E/340 1994 French TIS 15yr. 11mo. NC 2 AMOS1 0602 Communications Officer ACQ PISTOL M/340 1990 Spanish PEBD NA 1 AMOS2 JOINT PFT A/289 AMOS3 BMOS 9910 Unrestricted Officer MCMAP TAN AFADBD EDUCATION SUMMARY OSCD CIVILIAN MILITARY PME ACC COMM 1990 BA, Biology 1993 Winter Mountain Leader 2002 Command & Staff Non-Res DOR COMM 1986 Associates Deg 1993 Summer Mountain Leader 1997 AWS Ph II DOR LDO 1982 HS 1987 Airborne 1995 AWS Ph I DSG PILOT 1990 Assault Climbers 1994 Warfighting Skills Prog DCADB 1990 Infantry Officer (TBS) EAS 1989 Basic School ******* PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SUMMARY ******* ADMINISTRATIVE SUMMARY REPORTING SENIOR MARKINGS REVIEWING OFFICER MARKINGS Grade OCC From Months Billet Description Reporting Senior Per Pro Cou Eff Ini Lea Dev Set Ens Co PME Dec Jud Eval Reviewing Officer RO marks - same grade at processing BMOS Type To Com Adv Command Promote Reports RPT Avg RS Avg Rs High RPT at High RV at Proc Cum RV Obser Concur RO marks - same grade cumulative Capt GC 9 Company Commander LtCol Amaknife C C B B C C B C C B B B C H Col Curly 0/ / / / / / /7 0/8 0302 N X 1st Battalion 2d Marines Yes 14 of 17 2.53 2.25 2.82 1 94.60 96.00 Suff Yes 0/ / /3 12/ /5 11/ /7 0/8 Maj AN 3 Operations Officer LtCol Butcher C C C H C C H C H B H C C H Col Curly 0/ / / / / / /7 0/8 0302 N X 1st Battalion 2d Marines Yes 8 of 8 2.88 2.93 3.50 1 89.76 89.76 Suff Yes 0/ / / / / / /7 0/8 The Master Brief Sheet provides personal, training, service, and performance data. It is divided into two sections: administrative information and the performance evaluation summary. The master brief sheet is the primary document utilized by members of selection boards when tasked with building a case for such major events as selection for promotion, command, PME, and/or retention. Each Marine should ensure their master brief sheet contains the most current and accurate information. We recommend it be audited every two years and definitely 6-12 months prior to being considered for selection boards. Enlisted Marines should review their master brief sheet well in advance of requesting reenlistment or retirement as date gaps may cause delays until fixed. Maj CH 6 Operations Officer LtCol Inflated D F E C E E D D D D D E E H Col Moe 0/ / / / / / /7 0/8 0302 N 1st Battalion 2d Marines Yes 11 of 16 4.46 5.95 6.38 2 83.70 81.89 Suff No 1/ / / / /5 12/ /7 1/8 Maj TR 3 BN Executive Officer LtCol Solo B B C B B C B B C B B C B H Col Moe 0/ / / / / / /7 0/8 0302 N 1st Battalion 2d Marines Yes 1 of 1 2.30 2.30 2.30 1 N/A N/A Suff Yes 1/ / / / /5 12/ /7 1/8 Maj CH 12 Commanding Officer Col Amaker F F F F E F E E E E D D E E BGen Joe 1/ / / / / /6 12/7 0/8 9910 N X MCRS Pittsburg Yes 21 of 21 5.29 5.12 5.57 1 93.68 93.68 Suff Yes 2/ / / / / /6 16/7 1/8 Maj CH 14 Commanding Officer Col Tellall F E E E E F E E E E E E E E BGen Mooney 0/ / / / / /6 4/7 0/8 9910 N MCRS Pittsburg Yes 5 of 8 5.14 5.33 5.86 1 83.87 86.44 Suff No 0/ / / / /5 19/6 5/7 1/8 Maj TR 12 Commanding Officer Col Gofigure C D D D D C D D C D D D D D BGen Panzer 9910 N X MCRS Pittsburg Yes 7 of 12 3.79 4.42 5.00 1 83.67 80.00 Insuff

57 Administrative Summary
Grade OCC From Months Billet Description BMOS Type To Co Ad Command Capt GC 9 Company Commander 0302 N X 1st Battalion 2d Marines Maj AN 3 Operations Officer 0302 N X 1st Battalion 2d Marines Maj CH 6 Operations Officer 0302 N 1st Battalion 2d Marines Maj TR 3 BN Executive Officer 0302 N 1st Battalion 2d Marines

58 Administrative Summary (cont)
Grade OCC From Months Billet Description BMOS Type To Co Ad Command Capt GC 9 Company Commander 0302 N X 1st Battalion 2d Marines Maj AN 3 Operations Officer 0302 N X 1st Battalion 2d Marines Maj CH 6 Operations Officer 0302 N 1st Battalion 2d Marines Maj TR 3 BN Executive Officer 0302 N 1st Battalion 2d Marines

59 Reporting Senior Markings
Per Pro Cou Eff Ini Lea Dev Set Ens Co PME Dec Jud Eval Promote Reports RPT Avg RS Avg RS High RPT at High RV at Proc Cum RV LtCol Amaknife C C B B C C B C C B B B C H Yes 14 of 17 2.53 2.25 2.82 1 94.60 96.00 LtCol Butcher C C C H C C H C H B H C C H Yes 8 of 8 2.88 2.93 3.50 1 89.76 89.76 LtCol Inflated D F E C E E D D D D D E E H Yes 11 of 16 4.46 5.95 6.38 2 83.70 81.89 LtCol Solo B B C B B C B B C B B C B H Yes 1 of 1 2.30 2.30 2.30 1 NA NA

60 Reporting Senior Markings (cont)
Per Pro Cou Eff Ini Lea Dev Set Ens Co PME Dec Jud Eval Promote Reports RPT Avg RS Avg RS High RPT at High RV at Proc Cum RV LtCol Amaknife C C B B C C B C C B B B C H Yes 14 of 17 2.53 2.25 2.82 1 94.60 96.00 LtCol Butcher C C C H C C H C H B H C C H Yes 8 of 8 2.88 2.93 3.50 1 89.76 89.76 LtCol Inflated D F E C E E D D D D D E E H Yes 11 of 16 4.46 5.95 6.38 2 83.70 81.89 LtCol Solo B B C B B C B B C B B C B H Yes 1 of 1 2.30 2.30 2.30 1 NA NA

61 Reporting Senior Markings (cont)
Per Pro Cou Eff Ini Lea Dev Set Ens Co PME Dec Jud Eval Promote Reports RPT Avg RS Avg RS High RPT at High RV at Proc Cum RV LtCol Amaknife C C B B C C B C C B B B C H Yes 14 of 17 2.53 2.25 2.82 1 94.60 96.00 LtCol Butcher C C C H C C H C H B H C C H Yes 8 of 8 2.88 2.93 3.50 1 89.76 89.76 LtCol Inflated D F E C E E D D D D D E E H Yes 11 of 16 4.46 5.95 6.38 2 83.70 81.89 LtCol Solo B B C B B C B B C B B C B H Yes 1 of 1 2.30 2.30 2.30 1 NA NA

62 Reporting Senior Markings (cont)
Per Pro Cou Eff Ini Lea Dev Set Ens Co PME Dec Jud Eval Promote Reports RPT Avg RS Avg RS High RPT at High RV at Proc Cum RV LtCol Amaknife C C B B C C B C C B B B C H Yes 14 of 17 2.53 2.25 2.82 1 94.60 96.00 LtCol Butcher C C C H C C H C H B H C C H Yes 8 of 8 2.88 2.93 3.50 1 89.76 89.76 LtCol Inflated D F E C E E D D D D D E E H Yes 11 of 16 4.46 5.95 6.38 2 83.70 81.89 LtCol Solo B B C B B C B B C B B C B H Yes 1 of 1 2.30 2.30 2.30 1 NA NA

63 Reviewing Officer Markings
RO marks - same grade at processing Obser Concur RO marks - same grade cumulative Col Curly 0/ / / / / / / /8 Suff Yes 0/ / / / / / / /8 Col Curly 0/ / / / / / / /8 Suff Yes 0/ / / / / / / /8 Col Moe 0/ / / / / / / /8 Suff No 1/ / / / / / / /8 Col Moe 0/ / / / / / / /8 Suff Yes 1/ / / / / / / /8

64 SECTION K: Reviewing Officers Comparative Assessment
K. REVIEWING OFFICER COMMENTS 1. OBSERVATION: X Sufficient Insufficient 2. EVALUATION: X Concur Do Not Concur DESCRIPTION COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT 3. COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT: Provide a comparative assessment of potential by placing an "X" in the appropriate box. In marking the comparison, consider all Marines of this grade whose professional abilities are known to you personally. 1 6 2 THE EMINENTLY QUALIFIED MARINE ONE OF THE FEW EXCEPTIONALLY QUALIFIED MARINES X ONE OF THE MANY HIGHLY QUALIFIED PROFESSIONALS WHO FORM THE MAJORITY OF THIS GRADE *NUMBERS ELECTRONICALLY OVERLAID AT TIME OF PROCESSING *INFORMATION EFFECTIVE AT TIME PROCESSING AND WILL NOT CHANGE *INFORMATION WILL SHOW UP ON OMPF AND DIGITAL BOARDROOM COPIES OF FITREP A QUALIFIED MARINE UNSATISFACTORY NUMBERS INDICATE TOTAL ASSESSMENTS AND HOW MANY TIMES RO HAS MARKED MARINES OF SAME GRADE ON THAT PORTION OF COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT TREE.

65 (After Hours & Weekends)
HQMC Points of Contact DSN 278 -XXXX, COMM (703) XXXX Section Head: x3989 Deputy: x3994 SgtMaj: x3996 Head, Policy and Research Unit: x3991 Head, Reserve Matters Unit: 3991 Head, Processing Unit: x3442 WEBSITE MMSB MMSB (After Hours & Weekends)

66 Questions??????