Which of the following is not a reason why u.s. film viewing decreased during the 1950s?

• Anderson, J. D. (1998). The reality of illusion: An ecological approach to cognitive film theory. Carbondale, IL: SIU Press. 

• Anderson, R. C., & Pichert, J. W. (1978). Recall of previously unrecallable information following a shift in perspective. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17(1), 1–12. doi:10.1016/s0022-5371(78)90485-1.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Andrews-Hanna, J. R., Reidler, J. S., Huang, C., & Buckner, R. L. (2010). Evidence for the default network’s role in spontaneous cognition. Journal of Neurophysiology, 104(1), 322–335.

  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

• Andrews-Hanna, J. R., Reidler, J. S., Sepulcre, J., Poulin, R., & Buckner, R. L. (2010). Functional-anatomic fractionation of the brain’s default network. Neuron, 65(4), 550–562.

  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

• Baluch, F., & Itti, L. (2010). Training top-down attention improves performance on a triple-conjunction search task. PLoS One, 5(2), e9127.

  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

• Baluch, F., & Itti, L. (2011). Mechanisms of top-down attention. Trends in Neurosciences, 34(4), 210–224.

• Bazin, A. (1967). What is Cinema? Oakland, CA: University of California Press.

• Bezdek, M. A., Gerrig, R. J., Wenzel, W. G., Shin, J., Revill, K. P., & Schumacher, E. H. (2015). Neural evidence that suspense narrows attentional focus. Neuroscience, 303, 338–345.

  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

• Birmingham, E., Bischof, W. F., & Kingstone, A. (2008). Gaze selection in complex social scenes. Visual Cognition, 16(2–3), 341–355. doi:10.1080/13506280701434532.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Bordwell, D. (2002). Intensified continuity visual style in contemporary American film. Film Quarterly, 55(3), 16–28.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Bordwell, D., & Carroll, N. (1996). Post-theory: Reconstructing film studies. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Bordwell, D., & Thompson, K. (2001). Film Art: An Introduction (6th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

  Google Scholar 

• Bortolussi, M., & Dixon, P. (2003). Psychonarratology. Boston; Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Bransford, J. D., & Johnson, M. K. (1972). Contextual prerequisites for understanding: Some investigations of comprehension and recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11(6), 717–726.

• Broccoli, A. R. P., & Gilbert, L. D. (1979). Moonraker [Film]. Farmington Hills: Available from CBS/Fox Video.

• Brown, W. (2015). There’s no I in eye-tracking: how useful is eye-tracking to film studies. Refractory: A Journal of Entertainment Media, 25, 9.

  Google Scholar 

• Caldara, R., & Miellet, S. (2011). iMap: a novel method for statistical fixation mapping of eye movement data.Behavior Research Methods, 43(3), 864-878.

• Carmi, R., & Itti, L. (2006). Visual causes versus correlates of attentional selection in dynamic scenes. Vision Research, 46(26), 4333–4345.

• Chun, M. M., & Jiang, Y. (1998). Contextual cueing: Implicit learning and memory of visual context guides spatial attention. Cognitive Psychology, 36(1), 28–71.

  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

• Comito, T. (1986). Welles labyrinths: Introduction to a Touch of Evil. Avant Scene Cinema, 346–47, 6–34.

  Google Scholar 

• Coutrot, A., & Guyader, N. (2014). How saliency, faces, and sound influence gaze in dynamic social scenes. Journal of Vision, 14(8), 5.

  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

• Cristino, F., Mathôt, S., Theeuwes, J., & Gilchrist, I. D. (2010). ScanMatch: A novel method for comparing fixation sequences. Behavior Research Methods, 42(3), 692-700.

• Cutting, J. E. (2015). The framing of characters in popular movies. Art & Perception, 3(2), 191–212.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Cutting, J. E., Brunick, K. L., DeLong, J. E., Iricinschi, C., & Candan, A. (2011). Quicker, faster, darker: Changes in Hollywood film over 75 years. i-Perception, 2(6), 569–576.

  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

• D’Angelo, M. (2012). Touch of Evil. Retrieved from http://www.avclub.com/article/touch-of-evil-71058

• DeAngelus, M., & Pelz, J. (2009). Top-down control of eye movements: Yarbus revisited. Visual Cognition, 17(6), 790–811.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Dmochowski, J. P., Sajda, P., Dias, J., & Parra, L. C. (2012). Correlated components of ongoing EEG point to emotionally laden attention–a possible marker of engagement? Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 112.

  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

• Dorr, M., Martinetz, T., Gegenfurtner, K. R., & Barth, E. (2010). Variability of eye movements when viewing dynamic natural scenes. Journal of Vision, 10(10). doi:10.1167/10.10.28

• Eckstein, M. P., Drescher, B. A., & Shimozaki, S. S. (2006). Attentional cues in real scenes, saccadic targeting, and Bayesian priors. Psychological Science, 17(11), 973–980. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01815.x.

  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

• Ehinger, K. A., Hidalgo-Sotelo, B., Torralba, A., & Oliva, A. (2009). Modelling search for people in 900 scenes: A combined source model of eye guidance. Visual Cognition, 17(6), 945–978. doi:10.1080/13506280902834720.

  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

• Ehrlich, K., & Rayner, K. (1983). Pronoun assignment and semantic integration during reading: Eye movements and immediacy of processing. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22(1), 75–87.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Eisenstein, S. (1948). The film sense (J. Leyda, Trans. J. Leyda Ed.). London: Faber and Faber.

  Google Scholar 

• Findlay, J., & Walker, R. (1999). A model of saccade generation based on parallel processing and competitive inhibition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(4), 661–721.

  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Firestone, C., & Scholl, B. J. (2016). Cognition does not affect perception: Evaluating the evidence for “top-down” effects. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 39, 1-77.

• Foulsham, T., & Underwood, G. (2007). How does the purpose of inspection influence the potency of visual salience in scene perception? Perception, 36(8), 1123–1138.

  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

• Gardony, A. L., Taylor, H. A., & Brunyé, T. T. (2016). Gardony map drawing analyzer: Software for quantitative analysis of sketch maps. Behavior research methods, 48(1), 151-177.

• Gernsbacher, M. A. (1990). Language comprehension as structure building (Vol. xi). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Gernsbacher, M. A., Varner, K. R., & Faust, M. E. (1990). Investigating differences in general comprehension skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition, 16(3), 430–445.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Graesser, A. C., Singer, M., & Trabasso, T. (1994). Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review, 101(3), 371–395.

  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

• Gregory, R. L. (1970). The intelligent eye (1st ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

  Google Scholar 

• Hall, S. (1980). Encoding and decoding in the television discourse. Birmingham, England: Centre for Cultural Studies, University of Birmingham.

• Hasson, U., Landesman, O., Knappmeyer, B., Vallines, I., Rubin, N., & Heeger, D. J. (2008). Neurocinematics: The neuroscience of film. Projections, 2(1), 1–26.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hasson, U., Malach, R., & Heeger, D. J. (2010). Reliability of cortical activity during natural stimulation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14(1), 40–48.

• Hasson, U., Nir, Y., Levy, I., Fuhrmann, G., & Malach, R. (2004). Intersubject synchronization of cortical activity during natural vision. Science, 303(5664), 1634–1640. doi:10.1126/science.1089506.

  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

• Henderson, J. M. (2007). Regarding scenes. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(4), 219–222.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Henderson, J. M., Brockmole, J. R., Castelhano, M. S., & Mack, M. L. (2007). Visual saliency does not account for eye movements during visual search in real-world scenes. In R. V. Gompel, M. Fischer, W. Murray, & R. W. Hill (Eds.), Eye movements: A window on mind and brain (pp. 537–562). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

  Chapter  Google Scholar 

• Henderson, J. M., & Hollingworth, A. (1998). Eye movements during scene viewing: An overview. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Eye guidance in reading and scene perception (Vol. xi, pp. 269–293). Oxford: Elsevier Science Ltd.

  Chapter  Google Scholar 

• Henderson, J. M., Malcolm, G. L., & Schandl, C. (2009). Searching in the dark: Cognitive relevance drives attention in real-world scenes. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(5), 850–856.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Henderson, J. M., & Pierce, G. L. (2008). Eye movements during scene viewing: Evidence for mixed control of fixation durations. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15(3), 566–573.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Henderson, J. M., Shinkareva, S. V., Wang, J., Luke, S. G., & Olejarczyk, J. (2013). Predicting cognitive state from eye movements. PLoS One, 8(5), e64937. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0064937.

  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

• Henderson, J. M., & Smith, T. J. (2009). How are eye fixation durations controlled during scene viewing? Further evidence from a scene onset delay paradigm. Visual Cognition, 17(6–7), 1055–1082.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Ho, S., Foulsham, T., & Kingstone, A. (2015). Speaking and listening with the eyes: gaze signaling during dyadic interactions. PLoS One, 10(8), e0136905.

  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hyönä, J., & Lorch, R. F. (2004). Effects of topic headings on text processing: Evidence from adult readers’ eye fixation patterns. Learning and Instruction, 14(2), 131–152.

• Itti, L. (2005). Quantifying the contribution of low-level saliency to human eye movements in dynamic scenes. Visual Cognition, 12(6), 1093–1123.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Jesionowski, J. E. (1982). Thinking in Pictures: Dramatic structure in D.W. Griffith’s biograph films. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological Review, 87(4), 329–354.

  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kaakinen, J. K., Olkoniemi, H., Kinnari, T., & Hyönä, J. (2014). Processing of written irony: An eye movement study. Discourse Processes, 51(4), 287–311.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Katz, S. D. (1991). Film directing shot by shot: Visualizing from concept to screen. CA, US: Michael Wiese Productions.

  Google Scholar 

• Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95(2), 163–182.

  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Lahnakoski, J. M., Glerean, E., Jääskeläinen, I. P., Hyönä, J., Hari, R., Sams, M., …Nummenmaa, L. (2014). Synchronous brain activity across individuals underlies shared psychological perspectives. NeuroImage, 100, 316–324.

  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

• Lamont, P., Henderson, J. M., & Smith, T. J. (2010). Where science and magic meet: The illusion of a “science of magic”. Review of General Psychology, 14(1), 16–21.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Larson, A. M., Wallace, C., McQuade, M., Badke, C., & Loschky, L. C. (2011). The impact of scrambling the order of episode components on perceived events and recognition memory for a picture story [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 11(11), 1132. doi:10.1167/11.11.1132.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Larsson, L., Nyström, M., Ardö, H., Åström, K., & Stridh, M. (2016). Smooth pursuit detection in binocular eye-tracking data with automatic video-based performance evaluation. Journal of Vision, 16(15), 20.

  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

• Latif, N., Gehmacher, A., Castelhano, M. S., & Munhall, K. G. (2014). The art of gaze guidance. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 40(1), 33.

  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

• Loschky, L. C., Hutson, J. P., Magliano, J. P., Larson, A. M., & Smith, T. J. (2014). Explaining the film comprehension/attention relationship with the scene perception and event comprehension theory (SPECT). Lancaster: Paper presented at the 2014 annual meeting of the Society for Cognitive Studies of the Moving Image.

  Google Scholar 

• Loschky, L. C., Hutson, J. P., Magliano, J. P., Larson, A., & Smith, T. (2016). The scene perception and event comprehension theory (SPECT) applied to visual narratives. Chicago: Paper presented at the International Conference on Empirical Studies of Literature and Media.

  Google Scholar 

• Loschky, L. C., Larson, A. M., Magliano, J. P., & Smith, T. J. (2015). What would Jaws do? The Tyranny of Film and the relationship between gaze and higher-level narrative film comprehension. PLoS One, 10(11), e0142474. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0142474.

  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

• Loughlin, S. M., Grossnickle, E., Dinsmore, D., & Alexander, P. A. (2015). “Reading” paintings: evidence for trans-symbolic and symbol-specific comprehension processes. Cognition and Instruction, 33(3), 257–293.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Lumet, S. (1995). Making movies. New York: A.A. Knopf.

  Google Scholar 

• Magliano, J. P., Dijkstra, K., & Zwaan, R. A. (1996). Generating predictive inferences while viewing a movie. Discourse Processes, 22(3), 199–224.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Magliano, J. P., & Graesser, A. C. (1991). A three-pronged method for studying inference generation in literary text. Poetics, 20(3), 193–232.

• Magliano, J. P., Larson, A. M., Higgs, K., & Loschky, L. C. (2016). The relative roles of visuospatial and linguistic working memory systems in generating inferences during visual narrative comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 44(2), 207–219. doi:10.3758/s13421-015-0558-7.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Magliano, J. P., Loschky, L. C., Clinton, J., & Larson, A. M. (2013). Is reading the same as viewing? An exploration of the similarities and differences between processing text- and visually based narratives. In B. Miller, L. Cutting, & P. McCardle (Eds.), Unraveling the behavioral, neurobiological, and genetic components of reading comprehension (pp. 78–90). Baltimore: Brookes Publishing Co.

  Google Scholar 

• Magliano, J. P., Miller, J., & Zwaan, R. A. (2001). Indexing space and time in film understanding. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 15(5), 533–545.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Magliano, J. P., & Zacks, J. M. (2011). The impact of continuity editing in narrative film on event segmentation. Cognitive Science, 35(8), 1489–1517. doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01202.x.

  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

• Magliano, J. P., Higgs, K., & Clinton, J. (In press). Sources of complexity in comprehension across modalities of narrative experience. In M. Grishokova & M. Poulaki (Eds.), Cognition and narrative complexity. Lincoln: University of Nebraska press.

• Mannan, S. K., Ruddock, K. H., & Wooding, D. S. (1997). Fixation sequences made during visual examination of briefly presented 2D images. Spatial Vision, 11(2), 157–178.

  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

• McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R. (1992). Inference during reading. Psychological Review, 99(3), 440–466.

  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

• McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R. (1998). Memory-based language processing: Psycholinguistic research in the 1990s. Annual Review of Psychology, 49(1), 25–42.

  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

• McNamara, D. S., & Magliano, J. P. (2009). Toward a comprehensive model of comprehension. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), Psychology of Learning and Motivation (Vol. Volume 51, pp. 297-384). New York, NY: Elsevier Science. 

• Mital, P. K., Smith, T. J., Hill, R. L., & Henderson, J. M. (2010). Clustering of gaze during dynamic scene viewing is predicted by motion. Cognitive Computation, 3(1), 5–24. doi:10.1007/s12559-010-9074-z.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Murch, W. (2001). In the blink of an eye: A perspective on film editing. Los Angeles: Silman-James Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Myers, J. L., & O’Brien, E. J. (1998). Accessing the discourse representation during reading. Discourse Processes, 26(2–3), 131–157.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• O’brien, E. J., & Albrecht, J. E. (1992). Comprehension strategies in the development of a mental model. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition, 18(4), 777.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• O’Brien, E. J., & Cook, A. E. (2016). Separating the activation, integration, and validation components of reading psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 65, pp. 249–276). New York: Academic Press.

  Google Scholar 

• O’Brien, E. J., Shank, D. M., Myers, J. L., & Rayner, K. (1988). Elaborative inferences during reading: Do they occur on-line? Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition, 14(3), 410–420.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Pannasch, S., Helmert, J. R., Roth, K., Herbold, A. K., & Walter, H. (2008). Visual fixation durations and saccade amplitudes: Shifting relationship in a variety of conditions. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 2(2:4), 1–19.

  Google Scholar 

• Peters, R. J., Iyer, A., Itti, L., & Koch, C. (2005). Components of bottom-up gaze allocation in natural images. Vision Research, 45(18), 2397–2416.

  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

• Pudovkin, V. I. (1970). Film technique and film acting (I. Montagu, Trans.). New York: Grove.

  Google Scholar 

• Radvansky, G. A. (2005). Situation models, propositions, and the fan effect. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12(3), 478–483.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 372–422.

  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

• Rayner, K., Chace, K. H., Slattery, T. J., & Ashby, J. (2006). Eye movements as reflections of comprehension processes in reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10(3), 241–255.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Rayner, K., & Morris, R. K. (1990). Do eye movements reflect higher order processes in reading? In R. Groner, G. d’Ydewalle, & R. Parham (Eds.), From eye to mind: Information acquisition in perception, search, and reading (pp. 179–190). North-Holland: Elsevier Science Publishers.

  Google Scholar 

• Rayner, K., Raney, G. E., & Pollatsek, A. (1995). Eye movements and discourse processing. In R. F. Lorch Jr. & E. J. O’Brien (Eds.), Sources of coherence in reading (Vol. xiv, pp. 9–35). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

  Google Scholar 

• Reichle, E. D., Pollatsek, A., Fisher, D. L., & Rayner, K. (1998). Toward a model of eye movement control in reading. Psychological Review, 105(1), 125–157. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.105.1.125.

  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

• Reilly, R. G., & Radach, R. (2006). Some empirical tests of an interactive activation model of eye movement control in reading. Cognitive Systems Research, 7(1), 34–55.

• Reingold, E. M., & Stampe, D. M. (2000). Saccadic inhibition and gaze contingent research paradigms. In A. Kennedy, R. Radach, D. Heller, & J. Pynte (Eds.), Reading as a perceptual process (pp. 119–145). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

  Chapter  Google Scholar 

• Reingold, E. M., & Stampe, D. M. (2002). Saccadic inhibition in voluntary and reflexive saccades. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14(3), 371–388. doi:10.1162/089892902317361903.

  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

• Reisz, K., & Millar, G. (1953). The technique of film editing. London: Focal Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Robh. (2011). Touch of Evil opening shot location. Retrieved from http://broadviewgraphics.blogspot.com/2011/01/touch-of-evil-opening-shot-location.html

• Rouder, J. N., Morey, R. D., Speckman, P. L., & Province, J. M. (2012). Default Bayes factors for ANOVA designs. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 56(5), 356–374.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Rouder, J. N., Speckman, P. L., Sun, D., Morey, R. D., & Iverson, G. (2009). Bayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(2), 225–237.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Sanford, A. J., & Emmott, C. (2012). Mind, brain, and narrative. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Shepherd, S. V., Steckenfinger, S. A., Hasson, U., & Ghazanfar, A. A. (2010). Human-monkey gaze correlations reveal convergent and divergent patterns of movie viewing. Current Biology, 20(7), 649–656. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2010.02.032.

  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

• Simons, D. J., & Levin, D. T. (1998). Failure to detect changes to people during a real-world interaction. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5(4), 644–649.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Smith, T. J. (2012). The attentional theory of cinematic continuity. Projections, 6(1), 1–27. doi:10.3167/proj.2012.060102.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Smith, T. J. (2013). Watching you watch movies: Using eye tracking to inform cognitive film theory. In A. P. Shimamura (Ed.), Psychocinematics: Exploring Cognition at the Movies. New York: Oxford University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Smith, T. J. (2015). The role of audience participation and task relevance on change detection during a card trick. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 13.

  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

• Smith, T. J., Levin, D. T., & Cutting, J. E. (2012). A window on reality: Perceiving edited moving images. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21(2), 107–113. doi:10.1177/0963721412437407.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Smith, T. J., & Mital, P. K. (2013). Attentional synchrony and the influence of viewing task on gaze behaviour in static and dynamic scenes. Journal of Vision, 13(8), 16.

  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

• Spielberg, S. (2013). I had to change/Interviewer: T. Shone. The Sunday Times, Times Newpapers.

• Stam, R., & Miller, T. (1999). Film theory. US: Blackwell Publishers.

  Google Scholar 

• Stubbs, J. C. (1985). The Evolution of Orson Welles's "Touch of Evil" from Novel to Film. Cinema Journal, 24, 19-39. 

• Tarantino, Q. (1995). Tarantino waves goodbye to gangsterdom: Dan Glaister on movieland’s enfant terrible in verbal action/Interviewer: D. Glaister. The Guardian.

• Taya, S., Windridge, D., & Osman, M. (2012). Looking to score: The dissociation of goal influence on eye movement and meta-attentional allocation in a complex dynamic natural scene. PLoS One, 7(6), 1–9.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Thorndyke, P. W. (1977). Cognitive structures in comprehension and memory of narrative discourse. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 77–110.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Torralba, A., Oliva, A., Castelhano, M. S., & Henderson, J. M. (2006). Contextual guidance of eye movements and attention in real-world scenes: The role of global features in object search. Psychological Review, 113(4), 766–786.

  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

• Tseng, C., & Bateman, J. (2013). Revisiting cinematic authorship: A multimodal approach. London and New York: Routledge.

  Google Scholar 

• Tylén, K., Christensen, P., Roepstorff, A., Lund, T., Østergaard, S., & Donald, M. (2015). Brains striving for coherence: Long-term cumulative plot formation in the default mode network. NeuroImage, 121, 106–114.

  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

• van Dijk, T., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.

  Google Scholar 

• V˜o, M. L.-H., Smith, T. J., Mital, P. K., & Henderson, J. M. (2012). Do the eyes really have it? Dynamic allocation of attention when viewing moving faces. Journal of Vision, 12(13):3, 1–14.

• Wang, H. X., Freeman, J., Merriam, E. P., Hasson, U., & Heeger, D. J. (2012). Temporal eye movement strategies during naturalistic viewing. Journal of Vision, 12, 1. doi:10.1167/12.1.16.

  Google Scholar 

• Welles, O., & Zugsmith, A. (1958). Touch of Evil. In A. Zugsmith (Ed.), Universal Pictures.

• Wetzels, R., & Wagenmakers, E. (2012). A default Bayesian hypothesis test for correlations and partial correlations. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19(6), 1057–1064.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Wiley, J., & Rayner, K. (2000). Effects of titles on the processing of text and lexically ambiguous words: Evidence from eye movements. Memory & Cognition, 28(6), 1011–1021. doi:10.3758/bf03209349.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Yarbus, A. L. (1967). Eye movements and vision (B. Haigh, Trans.). New York: Plenum Press.

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Yeshurun, Y., Swanson, S., Simony, E., Chen, J., Lazaridi, C., Honey, C. J., …Hasson, U. (2017). Same story, different story: The neural representation of interpretive frameworks. Psychological Science, 28(3), 307–319.

  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

• Zacks, J. M., & Tversky, B. (2001). Event structure in perception and conception. Psychological Bulletin, 127(1), 3–21.

  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

• Zwaan, R. A., Langston, M. C., & Graesser, A. C. (1995). The construction of situation models in narrative comprehension: An event-indexing model. Psychological Science, 6(5), 292–297. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1995.tb00513.x.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Zwaan, R. A., & Radvansky, G. A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123(2), 162–185.

  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Page 2

1. The descriptive statistics are only presented for the main analyses run. The analyses run with different cleaning methods did change the mean values for fixation durations and saccade lengths, but since the interpretations did not change based on the inferential statistics those means are not presented