The Second Chance Act was passed and reauthorized in order to help meet the goal of

Read Lessons Learned from the Second Chance Act: Moving Forward to Strengthen Offender Reentry

The Second Chance Reauthorization Act of 2018 (Public Law 115-391) authorizes the provision of federal grants to government agencies and nonprofit organizations to provide employment assistance, substance abuse treatment, housing, family programming, mentoring, victim support and other services to individuals returning to the community from prison or jail.

The Second Chance Act aims to reduce recidivism and enhance public safety by increasing reentry programming and improving outcomes for individuals returning to their families and communities.

Title V of the First Step Act of 2018 directs NIJ to examine the effectiveness of grants used by the Department of Justice, specifically the Bureau of Justice Assistance (BJA), to support offender reentry and recidivism reduction programs at the State, local, Tribal, and Federal levels. Since fiscal year 2010, NIJ has awarded approximately $17 million in Second Chance Act funds for reentry-related research. See the table “Ongoing NIJ Evaluations of Second Chance Act Projects” for more information on NIJ-funded Second Chance Act grants and the table “Completed NIJ Evaluations of Second Chance Act Projects” for information on completed NIJ-funded Second Chance Act evaluation projects.

Ongoing NIJ Evaluations of Second Chance Act Projects
Title Awardee Award Amount Award Number
Assessing the Effectiveness of the Second Chance Act Grant Program through a Phased Evaluation Approach Using an Implementation Science Mixed Methods Approach Georgia State University Research Foundation, Inc. $2,142,620 2012-RY-BX-0013
Description: The applicant proposes to conduct a three-phased evaluation of at three sites implementing the Second Chance Act (SCA) program. Phase I will consist of a formative evaluation. The applicant proposes to determine if an outcome/impact evaluation is feasible at the SCA grantee site. It also seeks to assess the overall SCA goals to determine if the objectives are clear and if the site has a well-defined mechanism for measuring these objectives. The applicant will conduct evaluability assessments (EAs) and the data for the EAs will include program documents, administrative records, expenditure and revenue data, program reports, key informant interviews, training and technical assistance provider reports, and site visit program observations. The applicant also seeks to capture differences between purposeful and unintended deviations from program fidelity. Each site will also be assessed in terms of their feasibility to participate in a randomized controlled trial (RCT). The applicant intends to use data from the EAs to create practitioner-oriented articles highlighting the barriers to implementing rigorous, evaluable programs. The applicant intends to use the Corporation for National and Community Services (CNCS) evaluability assessment tool to guide these assessments. The tool captures organizational, program, and evaluation readiness for each site. Phase II will entail the development of the site-specific evaluation design. The applicant intends to implement an RCT, but if an RCT is not feasible, the appropriate quasi-experimental design will be determined. Finally, Phase III will consist of the implementation of the evaluation plan. The applicant intends to use a 36-month follow-up period to assess participant outcomes.
Completed NIJ Evaluations of Second Chance Act Projects
Title Awardee Award Amount Award Number
Evaluation of the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention FY2010 Second Chance Act Juvenile Offender Reentry Demonstration Projects Urban Institute $1,997,100 2012-RY-BX-0013
Description: 

Urban Institute assessed five juvenile SCA grantees funded in FY2008 to implement comprehensive reentry programs for high-risk youth, as well as to provide policymakers, practitioners, and funders with empirical evidence on the effectiveness of these programs in reducing recidivism and improving reintegration outcomes for youth offenders. The sites included Sacramento, California; Oakland, California; Tulsa, Oklahoma; Houston, Texas; and Tidewater, Virginia. Results show all sites attempted to implement key SCA elements, including prerelease service coordination and collaborative reentry planning; however, common challenges during the grant period prevented fidelity to program design. Changes in states’ juvenile justice administration in three program sites - California, Texas, and Virginia - also impeded intended implementation. The impacts evaluation included two of the sites. There was some indication of program benefit in Virginia, but it was not robust. The Oklahoma site showed lower recidivism during the treatment period, but it did not reach statistical significance.

Evaluation of the FY2011 BJA Second Chance Act Adult Offender Reentry Demonstration Projects (Focus Area 2) Research Triangle Institute $3,534,589 2012-RY-BX-0001
Description: RTI assessed the implementation, effects and cost-effectiveness of eight adult reentry programs funded by BJA in FY2010 and FY2011. Researchers assessed whether the programs achieved the primary goals of reducing recidivism and increasing public safety, as well as increasing employment and education opportunities, reducing violations of conditions of release, and other outcomes of interest.

See details about award 2012-RY-BX-0001 and access resulting reports.

An Evaluation of BJA Second Chance Act Adult Demonstration Projects Social Policy Research Associates $3,656,357 2010-RY-BX-0003
Description: SPR is conducting a 36-month evaluation of seven Second Chance Act adult offender re-entry demonstration projects funded by BJA in 2009. The evaluation includes impact, process and outcome analyses and cost assessments of re-entry services provided by the sites. Interim results from an implementation study of 10 Second Chance Act grantees found that many faced challenges in serving persons convicted of a crime due in part to the difficulty in developing re-entry programming. Programs that were able to overcome such challenges were able to cultivate strong relationships with community-based and other agencies and welcome a rehabilitative philosophy of the re-entry into society of convicted persons.

See details about award 2010-RY-BX-0003 and access resulting reports. 

Evaluation of the FY2011 BJA Second Chance Act Adult Offender Reentry Demonstration Projects (Focus Area 1) Urban Institute $399,433 2012-R2-CX-0032
Description: The Urban Institute conducted an intensive, comprehensive evaluability assessment (EA) of the 10 BJA Second Chance Act adult offender re-entry demonstration projects funded in FY2011. The EAs assessed each site's capacity and readiness for evaluation across multiple domains. Data on training and technical assistance needs were collected.
Read an abstract and access the executive summary for the FY2011 Second Chance Act Adult Offender Reentry Demonstration Projects Evaluability Assessment.

See details about award 2012-R2-CX-0032 and access resulting reports. 

An Evaluation of BJA's Second Chance Act FY2010 State, Tribal and Local Reentry Courts Program Northwest Professional Consortium, Inc. $2,998,850 2010-RY-BX-0001
Description: Northwest Professional Consortium, Inc., completed a multisite evaluation of the program. Researchers are using a process evaluation to document and compare program models and implementation; an impact evaluation to examine rearrests, reconvictions, violations and returns to incarceration using pre/post archival data; and cost-benefit analyses to calculate avoided public costs by comparing program interventions to "business-as-usual" conditions.

See details about award 2010-RY-BX-0001 and access resulting reports.

National Institute of Justice, "NIJ Evaluations of the Second Chance Act," April 26, 2022, nij.ojp.gov:
https://nij.ojp.gov/topics/articles/nij-evaluations-second-chance-act

The Second Chance Act of 2007 (H.R. 1593), titled "To reauthorize the grant program for reentry of offenders into the community in the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, to improve reentry planning and implementation, and for other purposes," was submitted to the House by Representative Danny Davis (D-IL) to amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to reauthorize, rewrite, and expand provisions for adult and juvenile offender state and local reentry demonstration projects to provide expanded services to offenders and their families for reentry into society. H.R. 1593 was signed into law April 9, 2008.

The Second Chance Act was passed and reauthorized in order to help meet the goal of
Second Chance Act of 2007Long titleAn act to reauthorize the grant program for reentry of offenders into the community in the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, to improve reentry planning and implementation, and for other purposesEnacted bythe 110th United States CongressCitationsPublic lawPub.L. 110–199 (text) (PDF)Statutes at Large122 Stat. 657CodificationActs amendedOmnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968Legislative history

  • Introduced in the House as H.R. 1593 by Danny K. Davis (D–IL) on March 20, 2007
  • Passed the House on November 13, 2007 (347-62)
  • Passed the Senate on March 11, 2008 (unanimous consent)
  • Signed into law by President George W. Bush on April 9, 2008

The Second Chance Act serves to reform the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968.[1] The purpose of the Second Chance Act is to reduce recidivism, increase public safety, and assist states and communities to address the growing population of inmates returning to communities. The focus has been placed on four areas: jobs, housing, substance abuse/mental health treatment and families. It also requires all federal facilities to document and report "the use of physical restraints on pregnant female prisoners during pregnancy, labor, delivery, and post-delivery and justify the use of restraints with documented security concerns".[2]

On April 20, 2005 Representative Robert Portman (R-OH2) introduced H.R.4676 [3] and Senator Samuel Brownback (R-KS) introduced S.2789 Second Chance Act 2005 [4] during the 108th Congressional Session however both bills died in committee. During the 109th Congressional Legislative Session, Senator Arlen Specter (D-PA) introduced S.1934 [5] and Representative Robert Portman (R-OH2) reintroduced the Second Chance Act (2007) S 1934 [6] without success. However, during the 110th Congressional Legislative Session, Sen. Joseph Biden (D-DE) and Representative Danny K. Davis (D-IL7) successfully ushered the passage of H.R.1593 [7] Second Chance Act of 2007 receiving bipartisan support from 218 Democrats, 129 Republicans [8] enacting the bill [9] into legislation on April 9, 2008.[10]

In 2011, Senator Patrick Leahy (D-VT) introduced S.1231[11] requesting reauthorization of the Second Chance Act during the 112th Congressional Legislative Session. Since that time, the submission has been placed on the Senate Legislative Calendar (July 21, 2011) where it has remained for further review.[12] The Reauthorization of the Second Chance Act provides for the expansion of state and local reentry demonstration projects to provide expanded services to offenders and their families for reentry into society, as well as the necessary services to remain productive members of society.

As of July 2008, the United States House of Representatives appropriated $45 million while the Senate tentatively appropriated $20 million for grants authorized under the Act.[13] The Second Chance Act provides a number of grants, over a two-year period, to state and local governments in order to:

  • promote the safe and successful reintegration of offenders into the community upon their release,
  • provide employment services, substance abuse treatment, housing, family programming, mentoring, victim services, and methods to improve release and relocation,
  • provide mentoring services to adult and juvenile offenders,
  • implement family-based treatment programs for incarcerated parents who have minor children,
  • provide guidance to the Bureau of Prisons for enhanced reentry planning procedures,
  • provide information on health, employment, personal finance, release requirements and community resources

The bill was reauthorized again in December of 2018 as part of the First Step Act.[14]

Each year, as approximately 650,000 people are released from state and federal prisons and between 10 and 12 million more are released from local jails, they struggle with substance abuse, lack of adequate education and job skills, and mental health issues, and a large number of these people return to prison within three years of their release due to inadequate services and opportunities. Two-thirds of released inmates are expected to be rearrested for a felony or serious misdemeanor within three years of release. Such high recidivism rates translate into thousands of new crimes each year.[15]

The National Institute of Justice Reports that 60 percent of former inmates remain jobless a year after their release because of their criminal records and the low literacy levels that hamper them in their search for employment.[16] Employment rates and earnings histories of people in prisons and jails are often low before incarceration as a result of limited education experiences, low skill levels, and the prevalence of physical and mental health problems; incarceration only exacerbates these challenges.[17]

Current laws deny housing to former offenders with drug-related convictions. A report by Human Rights Watch, No Second Chance,[18] focuses on the unfairness of the one-strike policy in public housing. More than 10 percent of those entering prisons and jails are homeless in the months before their incarceration. For those with mental illness the rates reach 20 percent. Released prisoners with a history of shelter use were almost five times as likely to have a post-release shelter stay.[19]

Over a fourth of all offenses are drug-related and over 70 percent of the recidivists return to prison with drug or alcohol problems, in part because little treatment has been made available during earlier incarceration and little was made available after their release. In a study of more than 20,000 adults entering five local jails, researchers documented serious mental illness in 14.5 percent of the men and 31 percent of the women, which taken together, comprises 16.9 percent of those studied.[20] The incidence of serious mental illness is two to four times higher among prisoners than it is in the general population.[21]

The Second Chance Act legislation authorizes federal grants to government agencies and nonprofit organizations to provide employment assistance, housing, substance abuse treatment, family programming, mentoring, victim's support and other related services that help reduce recidivism.[22] The Second Chance Act also establishes the National Offender Re-entry Resource Center [23] for the purpose of managing, monitoring, and disseminating information to the service providers and community organizations delivering services under the Second Chance Act.

Budget Request Senate House Final
FY2009 N/A $20 million $45 million $25 million
FY2010 $100 million $50 million $100 million $100 million
FY2011 $100 million $50 million $10 million $70 million

[24]

  1. ^ Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968
  2. ^ Sussman, Dana (2009). "Bound by Injustice: Challenging the Use of Shackles on Incarcerated Pregnant Women" (PDF). Cardozo Journal of Law & Gender. 15 (477).
  3. ^ Second Chance Act H.R. 4676
  4. ^ Second Chance Act 2004 S 2789
  5. ^ Second Chance Act 2005 HR 1704
  6. ^ Second Chance Act 2005 S. 1934
  7. ^ Second Chance Act of 2007 HR 1593 & Related Bill H. Con. Res. 270, S. 1060 [1]
  8. ^ Final Vote Results for Roll Call 1083
  9. ^ An Act: Second Chance Act of 2007: Community Safety Through Recidivism Prevention or Second Chance Act 2007 [2]
  10. ^ Second Chance Act HR 1593
  11. ^ S. 1231 Reauthorize the Second Chance Act
  12. ^ Congress.gov Library of Congress
  13. ^ Second Chance Act Slated to Receive $45 million in House Bill, $20 million in Senate Bill "Second Chance Act Slated to Receive $45 million in House bill, $20 million in Senate Bill". Archived from the original on 2012-01-17. Retrieved 2011-09-25.
  14. ^ "FY 2020 Second Chance Act Community-based Reentry Program". Bureau of Justice Assistance. March 4, 2020. Retrieved August 17, 2020.
  15. ^ Reentry Trends in the United States. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Assistance, 2002 [3]
  16. ^ Harlow, C.W. Education and Correctional Populations. NCJ 195670. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics, 2003. [4].
  17. ^ Holzer, H., S. Raphael, & M. Stoll. Employment Barriers Facing Ex-Offenders. Washington, D.C.: The Urban Institute, 2003. [5].
  18. ^ No Second Chance. Human Rights Watch
  19. ^ Metraux, S. & D.P. Culhane. "Homeless Shelter Use and Reincarceration Following Prison Release: Assessing the Risk." Criminology & Public Policy 3, no. 2 (2004): 201-22.
  20. ^ Hammett, T., C. Roberts, & S. Kennedy. "Health-Related Issues in Prisoner Reentry." Crime & Delinquency 47, no. 3 (2001): 390-409.
  21. ^ Steadman, H. J., F. Osher, P. C. Robbins, B. Case, & S. Samuels. (2009). "Prevalence of Serious Mental Illness Among Jail Inmates": 761-765.
  22. ^ U.S. Department of Justice-Office of Justice Programs
  23. ^ National Reentry Resource Center
  24. ^ Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2012 (Item #18) [6]

  • Second Chance Program

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Second_Chance_Act_(2007)&oldid=1105663337"